tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36271824.post4248604959842448010..comments2023-12-01T02:19:48.765-08:00Comments on Ed Gorman's blog: Talented NewcomersEd Gormanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06126267358266480356noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36271824.post-63053156405867740332012-09-27T16:21:53.158-07:002012-09-27T16:21:53.158-07:00What daunts me is the vast number of gifted writer...What daunts me is the vast number of gifted writers there are. I grew up in a fantasy of believing only a handful of real writers existed, the well-known ones, and I never imagined the abundance of talent there is. It didn't really sink in until I started blogging about three years ago and started reading really sophisticated, engaging stuff by folks with no publishing creds but who clearly could and should be published were the field set up differently. Maybe the Amazon junta, with its advent of direct ebook publishing will give more people who could never get past the legacy gatekeepers a chance to reach readers who otherwise would never hear of them - no matter how good they are. <br /><br />Then there are the genre partitions, behind which I am finding a bounty of not only gifted but widely recognized writers, within their genres, many of whom I'd not an inkling until I started reading your blog, Ed. <br /><br />Then I see aberrations come along - the Shades of Godawfuls and the fad lit and celebrity tell-alls and sell-outs - and I think, once again, maybe Amazon, monster tho it clearly is, might be the benevolent giant that kicks open doors that had been carefully guarded by an elite that's always suspect by those who don't have the password (and, truthfully, often with distinct justification) so that happenstance, creative marketing and pure frivolous fancy can have a go at letting the reading public decide who is readable and who is not. Maybe then the entrepreneurial side of publishing can apply its creativity to benefit both author and reader with less risk of a tired brilliant-but-rookie Random House reader (Styron) turning down a "Kon Tiki" as unmarketable or anal retentive publishers nixing a "Confederacy of Dunces" because it was submitted on grade school tablet paper, or the single roll of teletype paper upon which Kerouac typed and submitted "On the Road" and on and on. But don't get me started... ;-)Mathew Pausthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06157135006791553019noreply@blogger.com