“To me, O’Hara is the real Fitzgerald.”
—Fran Lebowitz, The Paris Review, 1993
Ed here: Fine as Fran Lebowitz's piece on John O'Hara is I can't agree with her that O'Hara was Fitzgerald's equal. He wasn't nearly as good a stylist, he lacked the range of skills Fitzgerald brought to the page and his work rarely had the echoes found in even some of Fitzgerald's magazine stories. But how O'Hara has slipped from view, I dunno. His gifts were extraordinary. He understood America's class system in a way not even Fitzgerald did and despite his braggadocio he did indeed get his time and his generation down without peer. He can still move and delight me over and over; shabby as some of his bestsellers might have been his enormous body of work belongs on the same shelf as Steinbeck, with Appointment in Samarra its masterpiece.
Ed here: Fine as Fran Lebowitz's piece on John O'Hara is I can't agree with her that O'Hara was Fitzgerald's equal. He wasn't nearly as good a stylist, he lacked the range of skills Fitzgerald brought to the page and his work rarely had the echoes found in even some of Fitzgerald's magazine stories. But how O'Hara has slipped from view, I dunno. His gifts were extraordinary. He understood America's class system in a way not even Fitzgerald did and despite his braggadocio he did indeed get his time and his generation down without peer. He can still move and delight me over and over; shabby as some of his bestsellers might have been his enormous body of work belongs on the same shelf as Steinbeck, with Appointment in Samarra its masterpiece.
Born in 1905 in Pennsylvania coal country, the son
of a small-town doctor, John O’Hara leapt to prominence with his first novel, Appointment
in Samarra (1934), about the downfall of a car dealer in the fictional town
of Gibbsville, Pa. With his second novel, BUtterfield 8 (1935), O’Hara
turned his sights on Manhattan and produced one of the great novels of New York
in the Depression. For the next three decades, his fiction shuttled back and
forth between Gibbsville and New York. Many of his short stories have stood the
test of time, but as a novelist he never surpassed his first efforts. His
novels of the mid-thirties are his classics, and they deserve to be much more
famous than they are.
According to Fran Lebowitz, O’Hara is underrated
“because every single person who knew him hated him.” This is an exaggeration,
as O’Hara’s biographers (most notably Geoffrey Wolff) have shown, but he could
be unpleasant, and his personality sometimes overshadowed his genius. When he
was drinking (roughly, from 1919 to 1954), he was notorious for picking fights
with whoever had the bad luck to be standing at the other end of a bar.
Sobriety curbed his temper, but not his violent yearning for recognition or his
self-punishing snobbery. In later life, O’Hara still cadged matchbooks from
clubs that wouldn’t have him as a member, and he demanded from his publishers
not just high advances but also gifts and lunches at the Ritz. He was addicted
to the tokens of success. O’Hara spent particular energy lobbying Yale for an
honorary degree, in vain: as then president Kingman Brewster explained, “He
wanted it too much.”
Yale comes up a lot in BUtterfield 8 and in
much of O’Hara’s later fiction. It was a sort of obsession of his. (Ernest
Hemingway once took up a collection “to send O’Hara to New Haven”: O’Hara was
in his thirties at the time.) To his lasting chagrin, he never attended
college. When he was still in high school, his father died suddenly, leaving
the family penniless. From the time he was a teenager, O’Hara supported himself
with his typewriter, first as a reporter in Pennsylvania, then in New York,
later by writing fiction. Over the years he published 247 stories in The New
Yorker (still a record) and a string of best sellers, but he never got over
the change in his family’s fortunes, for the O’Haras had lived well when he was
a boy, and he never stopped feeling locked out of the upper class. He was
morbidly conscious of being Irish American. As his alter ego in BUtterfield
8, the beat reporter Jimmy Malloy explains to the debutante Isabel
Stannard: “I am a Mick. I wear Brooks clothes and I don’t eat salad with a
spoon and I could probably play five-goal polo in two years, but I am a Mick.
Still a Mick … The people who think I am a Yale man aren’t very observing about
people.” For O’Hara, this was an ultimate condemnation, both of the unobserving
people and of himself.
for the rest go here:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/08/
he-told-the-truth-about-his-time-john-ohara-butterfield-8.html
6 comments:
Totally agree. Love O'Hara but not quite in the same category. But he does deserve to be remembered more. I will include this as a forgotten author if I may.
Ha. While the US President might still be a few years older than I (even if he did almost overlap me at the high school from which we were both graduated), I am now, I see, older than the author of this piece, and the editor of THE PARIS REVIEW, Lorin Stein. Oh, well, at least I was editing HAWAII REVIEW at age 18...if not for long...
To me his short stories are his best work - although some of them are 50 pages or more, hardly short. He was a fascinating if often unlikeable character.
Jeff M.
I'm with Jeff: love O'Hara's short stories. I enjoyed O'Hara's novels but all of them are problematic. The reports that O'Hara was hated by everyone might be exaggerated, but clearly he had a troubled personal life.
I recently read an article in the New York Review of Books that convinced me to pick up Appointment in Samarra.
It's here, if anyone is interested: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/08/great-american-bender-john-ohara/
I wrote about O'Hara's short stories several years ago for an FFB. He is primarily responsible for the development if what we now refer to as a "New Yorker short story." I've said it before, but I think if you read the works of O'Hara side-by-side with the works of John P. Marquand, you have the American old-world WASP versus brash second-generation Catholic immigrant saga writ large. And now both of them are almost entirely forgotten.
Deb
Post a Comment